En este modulo
- Project objective
- Section 1: Executive summary
- Section 2: Maturity assessment
- Section 3: Opportunity map
- Section 4: Prioritization (impact vs effort)
- Section 5: 12-month roadmap
- Section 6: Budget and allocation
- Section 7: Governance structure
- Section 8: KPIs and metrics
- Section 9: Risk assessment
- Section 10: Board presentation
- Final checklist
- Puntos clave
Project objective
This module is the capstone project for the Leadership and Strategy specialization. There is no new theory. Everything you need you have already learned in CX01-CX07. Now you apply it.
The deliverable is an AI strategy document for your company. Not an academic paper. A document you can present to the board of directors, the executive committee or your leadership team that generates concrete decisions.
The document has 10 sections. Each section is explained with its structure, key questions and a template you can fill in. The final result: a 15-25 page document that defines what your company does with AI, why, how, with what resources and with what expected outcomes.
Practical instruction
Do not try to make it perfect on the first draft. Fill each section with what you know today. Then refine. An imperfect but finished document is infinitely more useful than a perfect document that never gets completed. Use AI as an assistant to generate drafts of each section, but validate everything with your knowledge of the business.
Section 1: Executive summary
The executive summary is written last but read first. It is the only thing 50% of your audience will read. It must be self-contained: if someone only reads this page, they must understand what you propose, why, and what you need.
Structure (1 page, maximum 500 words)
- Context: 2-3 sentences on where the company stands today regarding AI. Maturity level (CX01). Current usage. Uncaptured opportunity.
- Vision: 1-2 sentences on where we want to be in 12 months. Specific, measurable, relevant to the business.
- Key opportunities: the 3 highest-impact opportunities identified. For each: what it does, what impact it has, what it costs.
- Investment required: total budget requested. High-level breakdown: tools, training, talent, infrastructure.
- Expected ROI: estimated return in 12 months. Conservative, not optimistic. Better to surprise upward than to disappoint.
- Decision requested: what you need the board to approve. Budget, responsible party, deadlines. Explicit.
"[Company] is at AI maturity level [1-5]. Currently, [X]% of employees use AI, but only [Y]% with approved tools. We have identified [3] opportunities that would generate an estimated impact of [Z] EUR in savings/revenue over 12 months.
Our vision: in 12 months, [company] will have AI integrated into [departments], with [N] automated processes, [measurable outcome].
Investment required: [total] EUR. Breakdown: tools [X], training [Y], talent [Z], infrastructure [W]. Expected ROI: [ratio] over 12 months.
We request board approval of the budget, designation of [responsible party] as the AI strategy lead, and quarterly progress reviews."
Section 2: Maturity assessment
Use the 5-level framework from CX01. Be honest. Overestimating your maturity creates unrealistic expectations and projects that fail.
What to assess
| Dimension | Questions to ask | Current level (1-5) |
|---|---|---|
| Current usage | How many employees use AI? With which tools? For which tasks? | |
| Governance | Is there an AI policy? A responsible party? A committee? | |
| Data | Is your data organized, accessible and of sufficient quality for AI? | |
| Talent | Do you have people with AI competencies? What level? How many? | |
| Infrastructure | Do you have the tools, APIs, integrations needed? | |
| Culture | Is the team open to AI? Is there resistance? Are there champions? |
The overall level is the average of the 6 dimensions, rounded down. If you have a 4 in usage and a 1 in governance, your real level is not 2.5. It is 1, because governance holds back everything else.
Critical gaps
Identify the 2-3 dimensions with the lowest scores. Those are your critical gaps. The action plan must prioritize them. There is no point investing in advanced tools (dimension 5) if you lack governance (dimension 2).
Section 3: Opportunity map
List all AI opportunities you have identified throughout this specialization. For each one, document:
Opportunity brief
- Name: descriptive, no jargon. "Automate monthly sales reports", not "Implement NLG pipeline".
- Department: which benefits directly.
- Current problem: what pain it solves. How much time/money it costs today.
- AI solution: how AI solves it. Which tool or model.
- Estimated impact: in hours saved, cost reduced or revenue generated. Be conservative.
- Effort: what you need to implement it. Tools, training, integration, time.
- Horizon: H1 (0-6 months), H2 (6-18 months), H3 (12-36 months).
- Dependencies: do you need something first? Clean data, trained team, approved tool.
Aim to identify 10-15 opportunities. Not all will be executed. But you need critical mass to prioritize well.
Section 4: Prioritization (impact vs effort)
With 10-15 opportunities identified, you need to decide which to execute first. Use the impact vs effort matrix:
How to score
Impact (1-10): how much value does this opportunity generate? Consider time savings, cost reduction, new revenue, quality improvement, competitive advantage.
Effort (1-10): how much does it cost to implement? Consider time, money, technical complexity, organizational change, dependencies.
The 4 quadrants
- High impact, low effort (quick wins): execute immediately. These are your first victories. They generate confidence and budget for larger projects.
- High impact, high effort (strategic projects): plan and execute in H2-H3. They need resources, but the return justifies them.
- Low impact, low effort (filler): execute if resources are left over, but never at the expense of quick wins or strategic projects.
- Low impact, high effort (discarded): do not execute. They consume resources without proportional returns.
Select 3-5 quick wins for the first 90 days. 2-3 strategic projects for the year. Discard the rest without guilt.
Common mistake
Many AI plans start with the most ambitious project. That is a mistake. Start with quick wins that demonstrate value in 30-60 days. That generates credibility, budget and support for the big projects. A plan that takes 6 months to show results loses board support.
Section 5: 12-month roadmap
The roadmap translates prioritization into a calendar. It is not a Gantt chart with 200 tasks. It is a high-level plan with clear milestones.
Quarterly structure
Q1 (months 1-3): Foundations
- Approve AI policy and designate responsible party
- Complete AI systems inventory and AI Act classification
- Basic training (Level 1) for the entire team
- Execute 3 identified quick wins
- Measure baseline for key metrics
Q1 milestone: policy approved, team trained, 3 processes improved with AI, baseline metrics established.
Q2 (months 4-6): Scale
- Advanced training (Level 2) for champions and managers
- Implement AI productivity tools across all departments
- Launch the first strategic project (H2)
- Evaluate AI Act compliance for high-risk systems
- First metrics review vs baseline
Q2 milestone: adoption >40%, first strategic project underway, compliance evaluated.
Q3 (months 7-9): Deepen
- Evaluate data sovereignty and cloud/self-hosted decisions
- Complete first strategic project, launch second
- Pilot new AI product/service (if applicable, H2-H3)
- Adoption audit and plan adjustment
Q3 milestone: adoption >60%, first strategic project completed, pilot launched.
Q4 (months 10-12): Consolidate
- Evaluate year-end results: actual ROI vs estimated
- Scale projects that work, kill those that do not
- Prepare Year 2 AI strategy (based on real learnings)
- Present results to the board
Q4 milestone: ROI demonstrated, Year 2 plan prepared, board presentation delivered.
Section 6: Budget and allocation
The budget must be specific, justified and realistic. Board members do not approve "investing in AI". They approve "EUR 120,000 for training, tools and infrastructure that will generate an estimated EUR 300,000 in savings over 12 months".
Spending categories
| Category | What it includes | Typical range (SME 100-500 emp.) |
|---|---|---|
| Tools | AI SaaS licenses, APIs, platforms | EUR 20-60K/year |
| Training | Programs, certifications, workshops | EUR 15-40K/year |
| Talent | New hires, external consulting | EUR 0-150K/year |
| Infrastructure | Servers, GPUs, storage (if self-hosted) | EUR 0-50K/year |
| Compliance | AI Act audit, legal consulting, documentation | EUR 5-20K/year |
| Contingency | 10-15% of total for unforeseen expenses | 10-15% of total |
How to justify the investment
For every euro requested, show the expected return. Not in generic terms ("improve productivity") but in concrete numbers:
- "Training 100 employees (EUR 30K) will save 2 hours/person/week. At an average cost of EUR 25/hour, that is EUR 260K/year in freed productivity."
- "Automating tier-1 support (EUR 15K for the tool) will resolve 40% of tickets without human intervention. With 500 tickets/month, that saves 200 agent hours/month."
- "The AI product pilot (EUR 20K) has the potential to generate EUR 150K in revenue over 12 months if we validate with 5 pilot clients."
Section 7: Governance structure
Governance defines who decides what about AI. Without governance, each department does what it wants, buys tools without coordination and generates risks nobody controls.
Minimum roles
- Executive sponsor: a member of the executive committee who backs the AI strategy. Does not need technical expertise. Needs authority and commitment.
- AI lead: the person who executes the strategy day to day. Can be a CAIO, a Head of Innovation, a CTO with an expanded mandate. Needs dedicated time (minimum 50%).
- AI committee: monthly meeting with representatives from Legal, IT, HR, Business and the AI lead. Decides: which tools are approved, which projects launch, which risks are escalated.
- Department champions: 1 per 20-30 employees (CX04). They are the committee's execution arm in each area.
Minimum policies
- Acceptable use policy: which tools are approved, what data can be shared, what is not permitted.
- Acquisition policy: process for evaluating and approving new AI tools. Who requests, who evaluates, who approves.
- Data policy: data classification for AI use (public, internal, confidential, prohibited). Aligned with GDPR and the AI Act.
- Incident policy: what to do when AI makes an error with impact. Who is notified, how it is escalated, how it is documented.
Section 8: KPIs and metrics
Define between 5 and 10 KPIs that demonstrate the AI strategy's progress. Each KPI must have: definition, calculation formula, baseline, 12-month target and measurement frequency.
Recommended KPIs
| KPI | Formula | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Adoption rate | Active AI users / Total employees | Monthly |
| Time saved | Hours freed by AI / week / employee | Quarterly |
| AI ROI | (Value generated - Investment) / Investment | Semi-annual |
| Quick wins completed | H1 projects delivered vs planned | Monthly |
| AI Act compliance | High-risk systems in compliance / Total high-risk | Quarterly |
| AI tool NPS | Net Promoter Score of tool satisfaction | Quarterly |
| Team AI competency | % of employees at Level 2+ competencies | Semi-annual |
| Shadow AI | % of employees using unapproved tools | Quarterly |
Rule of thumb
Start by measuring 3 KPIs. Add more when the first ones are stabilized. Every KPI you measure is a KPI someone has to report. If you measure 15 KPIs from day 1, nobody reports them and they become decoration.
Section 9: Risk assessment
Every plan has risks. Documenting them is not pessimism, it is professionalism. The board wants to know you have thought about what can go wrong and that you have a plan for it.
Risk framework
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low adoption | Medium | High | Champion program, visible quick wins, incentives |
| Data leak via AI | Medium | High | Data policy, approved tools, security training |
| AI Act non-compliance | Low-Medium | Very high | Inventory, risk assessment, compliance from Q1 |
| Vendor lock-in | High | Medium | Multi-vendor, API abstraction, open-weight model for critical |
| Insufficient budget | Medium | Medium | 15% contingency, quick wins generating savings to reinvest |
| Team resistance | High | Medium | Resistance spectrum (CX04), communication, do not force |
| Insufficient data quality | High | High | Data audit before AI projects, cleanup plan |
| Unrealistic expectations | High | Medium | Conservative ROI, measurable milestones, realistic communication |
For each risk: who monitors it, how often it is reviewed, what trigger activates the mitigation plan.
Section 10: Board presentation
The strategy document is the complete reference. The board presentation is the pitch. They are not the same. The presentation is what persuades. The document is what gets consulted afterward.
Presentation structure (10-15 slides, 30 minutes)
- Slide 1: Title and context (30 sec). "AI Strategy [Company] 2026-2027".
- Slide 2: Why now (2 min). Three urgent reasons: competition, regulation, market opportunity.
- Slide 3: Where we stand (2 min). Maturity level. Current usage. Critical gaps.
- Slide 4: Where we are heading (2 min). 12-month vision. Expected outcome. KPIs.
- Slides 5-7: The 3 key opportunities (6 min). One slide per opportunity: problem, solution, impact, cost.
- Slide 8: Roadmap (2 min). 4 quarters with key milestones. Visual, not text.
- Slide 9: Budget (2 min). Investment required vs expected return. One clear table.
- Slide 10: Risks and mitigation (2 min). Top 3 risks with a plan. Shows you have thought about what can go wrong.
- Slide 11: Governance (1 min). Who leads, how decisions are made, when reviews happen.
- Slide 12: Decision requested (2 min). What you need them to approve. Budget, responsible party, deadlines. Explicit.
Rules for the presentation
- Less text, more numbers. Board members do not read paragraphs on slides. They want figures, charts, comparisons.
- Talk business, not technology. Do not mention model names or architectures. Talk about outcomes: savings, revenue, risk, competitiveness.
- Anticipate questions. The 3 questions they always ask: "how much does it cost?", "how much do we save?" and "what happens if we do nothing?". Have the answers ready with numbers.
- Ask for something concrete. "We request approval of EUR 120K in budget, the designation of [name] as AI lead, and a quarterly progress review at the executive committee."
The million-dollar question
The skeptical board member always asks: "what happens if we do nothing?". Have the answer: "our competitors are already investing. In 18 months, the productivity gap will be [X]%. The cost of inaction is greater than the cost of action." Back it up with industry data (CX01, CX07).
Final checklist
- Executive summary (1 page): context, vision, opportunities, investment, ROI, decision requested
- Maturity assessment (6 dimensions scored, gaps identified)
- Opportunity map (10-15 briefs with impact, effort, horizon)
- Prioritization matrix (quadrants, 3-5 quick wins selected)
- 12-month roadmap (4 quarters with measurable milestones)
- Budget (by category, with justification and expected ROI)
- Governance structure (roles, committee, minimum policies)
- KPIs (5-10 metrics with baseline, target and frequency)
- Risk assessment (top 5-8 with likelihood, impact and mitigation)
- Board presentation (10-12 slides, 30 minutes)
Bonus: ask the AI: "Review my AI strategy document. Look for gaps, inconsistencies between sections, overly optimistic estimates and opportunities I may have missed. Be critical." Use the feedback to refine the final document.
Puntos clave
Puntos clave from CX08
- An AI strategy is not an academic paper. It is an action plan that generates concrete decisions.
- Executive summary: the only thing 50% of your audience reads. It must be self-contained and end with a clear decision request.
- Assess maturity honestly. Your real level is your weakest dimension.
- Prioritize with impact vs effort. Start with quick wins that demonstrate value in 30-60 days.
- Quarterly roadmap: foundations, scale, deepen, consolidate. Measurable milestones at each stage.
- Budget justified with concrete ROI. Board members approve numbers, not concepts.
- The board's question: "what happens if we do nothing?". The cost of inaction exceeds the cost of action.
Guia de estudio — Conceptos clave de CX08
Objetivo del proyecto
- Instruccion practica: No intentes hacerlo perfecto en el primer borrador. Rellena cada seccion con lo que sabes hoy. Luego refina. Un documento imperfecto pero terminado es infinitamente mas util que un documento perfecto que nunca se acaba. Usa la IA como asistente para generar borradores de cada seccion, pero valida todo con tu conocimiento del negocio.
Seccion 1: Executive summary
- Contexto:2-3 frases sobre donde esta la empresa hoy respecto a IA. Nivel de madurez (CX01). Uso actual. Oportunidad no capturada.
- Vision:1-2 frases sobre adonde queremos llegar en 12 meses. Especifico, medible, relevante para el negocio.
- Oportunidades clave:las 3 oportunidades de mayor impacto identificadas. Para cada una: que hace, que impacto tiene, cuanto cuesta.
- Inversion requerida:presupuesto total solicitado. Desglose alto nivel: herramientas, formacion, talento, infraestructura.
- ROI esperado:retorno estimado en 12 meses. Conservador, no optimista. Mejor sorprender hacia arriba que decepcionar.
- Decision solicitada:que necesitas que apruebe el consejo. Presupuesto, responsable, plazos. Explicito.
Seccion 2: Evaluacion de madurez
- Uso actual Cuantos empleados usan IA? Con que herramientas? Para que tareas? Governance Hay politica de IA? Hay responsable? Hay comite? Datos Estan tus datos organizados, accesibles y de calidad suficiente para IA? Talento Tienes personas con competencias IA? De que nivel? Cuantas? Infraestructura Tienes las herramientas, APIs, integraciones necesarias? Cultura El equipo esta abierto a la IA? Hay resistencia? Hay champions?El nivel global es el promedio de las 6 dimensiones, redondeado hacia abajo. Si tienes un 4 en uso y un 1 en governance, tu nivel real no es 2.5. Es 1, porque la governance frena todo lo demas.
Seccion 3: Mapa de oportunidades
- Nombre:descriptivo, sin jerga. "Automatizar informes mensuales de ventas", no "Implementar pipeline de NLG".
- Departamento:cual se beneficia directamente.
- Problema actual:que dolor resuelve. Cuanto tiempo/dinero cuesta hoy.
- Solucion IA:como la IA lo resuelve. Que herramienta o modelo.
- Impacto estimado:en horas ahorradas, coste reducido o revenue generado. Se conservador.
- Esfuerzo:que necesitas para implementarlo. Herramientas, formacion, integracion, tiempo.
Seccion 4: Priorizacion (impacto vs esfuerzo)
- Impacto (1-10): cuanto valor genera esta oportunidad? Considera ahorro de tiempo, reduccion de costes, revenue nuevo, mejora de calidad, ventaja competitiva.
- Esfuerzo (1-10): cuanto cuesta implementarla? Considera tiempo, dinero, complejidad tecnica, cambio organizativo, dependencias.
- Alto impacto, bajo esfuerzo (quick wins):ejecutar inmediatamente. Son tus primeras victorias. Generan confianza y presupuesto para proyectos mayores.
- Alto impacto, alto esfuerzo (proyectos estrategicos):planificar y ejecutar en H2-H3. Necesitan recursos, pero el retorno los justifica.
- Bajo impacto, bajo esfuerzo (relleno):ejecutar si sobran recursos, pero nunca a costa de los quick wins o proyectos estrategicos.
- Bajo impacto, alto esfuerzo (descartados):no ejecutar. Consumen recursos sin retorno proporcional.
Seccion 5: Roadmap 12 meses
- Aprobar politica de IA y designar responsable
- Completar inventario de sistemas IA y clasificacion AI Act
- Formacion basica (Nivel 1) para todo el equipo
- Ejecutar 3 quick wins identificados
- Medir baseline de metricas clave
- Hito Q1: politica aprobada, equipo formado, 3 procesos mejorados con IA, metricas baseline establecidas.
You have completed the Leadership and Strategy specialization
8 modules. From strategic vision to a complete strategy document. You now have the knowledge and tools to lead the AI transformation of your organization. The next step is yours: execute the plan.
Discover Enterprise Solutions